Oops, meant to add two more things:

1) RSSI:  Received Signal Strength Indicator.  I would love to see the strength in an "S1 through S9 then +10db, +20db, +40db" in an analog-style VU-type "meter" readout, preferred, like on most radio gear.  The readings we usually get from WiFi devices that are strictly a negative dB value would be worthless to me without some kind of calibration.

2)  See the bottom section of this image -- .  What are the "Group List" slots I see now?  I didn't have these before the update.

In case the image didn't load, this is it here.

Thanks!

New features will be added, but maximum priority has been given to fixing bugs.

Tech addict,   Regarding your last posts, I really agree,  It would be great to have some features added,  but I can  understand BV9500 pro is just a phone with UHF communication capabilities, not a full features tranceiver (with phone capability)......      Some features requested are only internal sofware so it can be added with developpement time and ressources,  some would be hardware, seems difficult to be added. 

BH41 wrote:

Tech addict,   Regarding your last posts, I really agree,  It would be great to have some features added,  but I can  understand BV9500 pro is just a phone with UHF communication capabilities, not a full features tranceiver (with phone capability)......      Some features requested are only internal sofware so it can be added with developpement time and ressources,  some would be hardware, seems difficult to be added. 

Perhaps, but it never hurts to ask.  I'd love to see it and if we never ask, we may never receive.  I mean, really, who puts a transceiver in a cellphone in the first place?  Oh, wait...  that's what a cellphone *IS*.  But your point is taken and perfectly valid.  At the same time, if we downplay what we have, "just a phone, with just an added feature", it diminishes its worth.  I prefer to augment it:  "maybe it's just a phone, but look what it can do, and if we make these few changes, look how much MORE it can do!"  Y'know?
But let me pose a different scenario.  So, my first car had a radio.  One speaker, AM/FM but no cassette, barely tuned for crap, but why ask for better?  I mean, who would put a radio in a motor vehicle in the first place? 

Really I completely agree !  but I also unterstood it's not development team priority !

BH41 wrote:

Really I completely agree !  but I also unterstood it's not development team priority !

We're on the same page

blackview_admin wrote:

Will forward that to the tech team

What about the use of bluetooth motorcycle head set and the ise of the microphone... When connected the bt device, the intercom app use only the speakers, but if i speak and transmit it uses the phone microphone.. how stupid is that!!!

stenfo777 wrote:

blackview_admin wrote:

Will forward that to the tech team

What about the use of bluetooth motorcycle head set and the ise of the microphone... When connected the bt device, the intercom app use only the speakers, but if i speak and transmit it uses the phone microphone.. how stupid is that!!!

Haha. Let us count the ways....